BarkingDogs.net

Return to the News of the Usual Legal Runaround

Introduction to the News of the Usual Legal Runaround

Perhaps the most shocking aspect of the barking epidemic is the legal system's perverse approach to the problem. From the politicians who pass unenforceable ordinances to the judges who consistently side with the perpetrators, and on down to the police and animal control officers who don't even try to enforce the laws.

Indeed, to judge by their behavior, one has to conclude that maintaining chronic barking as a quasi-legal event is the real intent of those who administer the system. Certainly, there seems to be little enthusiasm within the legal community for enacting effective measures that would, in actual fact, serve to quickly rein-in those who keep barking dogs.

The purpose of this section, then, is to expose the legal system's fraudulent representation of itself as a force of opposition standing against chronic barking, and illuminate its true role as the enabling linchpin that perpetuates the barking epidemic, and makes it possible for it to continue on year after year.

Some of the news stories on the Legal Runaround page focus on the passage or enforcement of "anti-barking" laws. Those articles will be more meaningful to you if you first take a quick minute to read A Nutshell Description of the Most Common Types of Barking Laws.

Return to the News of the Usual Legal Runaround

This page is the introduction to the News of the Usual Legal Runaround
which is a component of the Barking Dog News and barkingdogs.net